Reps fault FG’s 56% budget implementation claim
Chairman, House of Representative Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Zakari Mohammed
| credits: File copy
| credits: File copy
The
House of Representatives on Sunday faulted the claim by the Executive
that it had achieved 56 per cent implementation of the 2012 budget.
It said the 56 per cent was the
percentage of the N404bn of cash-backed releases to Ministries,
Departments and Agencies and that the figure represented only 34 per
cent of the N1.5tn capital component of the budget.
The House said this at a media briefing
in Abuja in its reaction to Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala’s
claim that the government had implemented 56 per cent of the budget.
It also said it was not going back on
its resolution to commence impeachment proceedings against President
Goodluck Jonathan if he failed to achieve 100 per cent implementation of
the budget by September.
The minister’s claim came as part of government’s responses to the threat to commence impeachment proceedings against Jonathan.
The Information Committee Chairman of
the House, Zakari Mohammed, who addressed the media, noted that by the
finance minister’s statement, only N324bn of the N404bn released so far
for capital project had been cash-backed in July.
He said, “This was the grouse of the
House. We are in the seventh month, going to the eighth month of the
year; out of N1.5tn, you have cash-backed only N324bn. That is not good
enough; that is the point that is being made. The budget performance is
not encouraging.”
“It is not true that the Executive arm has implemented as at today 56 per cent of the 2012 budget as widely reported.
“In truth, about 34 per cent of the
budget has been implemented. What the minister admitted to, as can be
confirmed from her own words, is that, at best government has
implemented 56 per cent of the N404bn released to MDAs.
“The minister was clear in saying that of this amount (N404bn), only N324bn has so far been cash-backed.
“In other words, it is only N324bn that
is available to the MDAs for capital projects and programmes of
government out of about N1.5tn appropriated for all capital
expenditure.”
Mohammed said that the House did not
agree with the minister that the slow pace of implementation of the 2012
budget was as a result of the constituency projects introduced into the
budget by the National Assembly.
“For the avoidance of doubt,
constituency projects represent less than 10 per cent of the 2012
capital budget. How can this be the reason for the slow implementation
of the budget?
“This excuse for non-implementation
falls flat on its face when a review of the performance of the Executive
on even its own preferred projects is made.
“More evidential is the fact that
releases so far made to the MDAs are not enough to pay for on–going
projects or projects chosen by the Executive.
“For instance, out of a total
appropriation of N145bn for the Ministry of Works in the budget, only
N47bn has so far been released to the ministry.
“In the first quarter, N38bn was
released and in the second quarter only N9bn was released, with a
shortfall of about N30bn for the second quarter. The projects that need
these appropriations are core road projects in all over the country.
“Or are these inter-state highways and
other strategic road projects also constituency projects? Playing to the
gallery by the Executive arm will not change the facts of the
situation.”
Mohammed observed that by withholding
the funds of MDAs, the minister had committed “an illegality” under
Section 6 of the 2012 Appropriation Act.
The section reads, “The minister of
Finance shall ensure that funds appropriated under this Act are released
to the appropriate agencies and or organs of government as and when
due, provided that no funds for any quarter of the fiscal year shall be
deferred without prior waiver from the National Assembly.”
The committee chairman reiterated the July 19 stance of the House to commence impeachment proceedings against Jonathan.
He explained that the lawmakers’ stance would correct the impression that they had been a “toothless bulldog.”
“That we are not a toothless bulldog
means that we will use all the constitutional powers at our disposal to
ensure that the budget is fully implemented. The action we took before
we went on vacation showed that we have charted a new course; things
will not remain the same”, he added.
The lawmaker said the impeachment threat
had sent the right signal to the Executive, as evidenced in the “rapid”
release of funds to the MDAs in the last one week.
Okonjo-Iweala had stated last week that
nowhere in the world was a budget ever implemented 100 per cent, an
indication that there was no way Jonathan would meet the 100 per cent
target in September.
Meanwhile, Jonathan’s political adviser,
Ahmed Gulak, told one of our correspondents on Sunday that the claims
by some South-South leaders that the leadership of the Peoples
Democratic Party was giving tacit support to the House of
Representatives members in their threat to impeach the President were
untrue.
Gulak said while the South-South leaders
had the right to hold opinions like other Nigerians, the President did
not believe their claims on the current issue.
Jonathan is an indigene of Bayelsa State which is one of the South-South states.
Following statements credited to the
Deputy National Chairman of the PDP, Dr. Sam Jaja, that Jonathan had
committed blunders that required his impeachment, elders and activists
from the zone have accused the PDP of supporting the plan to impeach the
President.
President of the Conference of Ethnic
Nationalities of Niger Delta, Prof. Kimse Okoko, was quoted on Sunday as
describing Jaja’s comments as “a conspiracy theory.” He asked Jaja to
name the impeachable offences that Jonathan had committed.
“Coming from someone from the Niger
Delta, it is a conspiracy theory. Let him tell us what the impeachable
errors are. Unless he says so it will be unfair for him to come up with
this conspiracy theory. It is an irresponsible statement because he has
not mentioned the errors,” Okoko said.
